Professor Randall Kroszner says the US.economy is on a reasonable growth path. He analyzes the Fed’s approach to inflation on Bloomberg TV: https://t.co/yZhrJiJIPu
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 9, 2020
Is value investing permanently broken? A paper by professor Eugene Fama analyzes changes in value premiums over the last few decades: https://t.co/68AFsC77fC @business pic.twitter.com/nJbtOICi9F
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 8, 2020
“Anything having to do with the consumer and the job market in the US has been quite strong,” professor Austan Goolsbee says of the economy. On the other hand, he cautions that manufacturing, business investment, and trade are weak: https://t.co/0kq8kpSYrI
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 8, 2020
Although central banks make statements about future trends, research suggests that the public doesn’t always understand the message. https://t.co/TkqFKUvyJg @chicagoboothrev
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 8, 2020
Should the United States keep the electoral college? https://t.co/uqo8UVJAHO
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 7, 2020
Is the SEC’s shareholder voting reform damaging to the rights of shareholders? https://t.co/o6rSX6yebH
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 7, 2020
Professor Eugene Fama and David Booth, ’71, reflect on their friendship, which extends back half a century:https://t.co/VwEunc6968
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 6, 2020
Professor Richard Thaler’s research finds that auto-enrollment often helps workers increase their retirement savings. Learn how: https://t.co/OmKdUmWIdD
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 6, 2020
Anonymized LinkedIn data reveals how employees behave under worsening company conditions:https://t.co/1Z2GfdTIZo pic.twitter.com/rTsHCkGJco
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 6, 2020
Professor Sendhil Mullainathan explains “survivorship bias” and how attaching meaning to luck leads to faulty choices and beliefs: https://t.co/pU9wAntEAi @sciam
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 6, 2020
How can individuals ensure they pay down credit card debts optimally?
For starters, @NealeMahoney suggests targeting your highest interest rate. @NYTimeshttps://t.co/VPdJsCstP1
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 5, 2020
Professor Waverly Deutsch explains why an entrepreneur’s network is their greatest asset: https://t.co/CGH2VJ2BbN
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 5, 2020
A new study suggests that lucrative career prospects in the private sector encourage many legislators to leave office. ProMarket explains how this can shape political outcomes and legislative behavior: https://t.co/viX7xoftKQ @ProMarket_org
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 5, 2020
Michael Bloomberg suggested some of his fellow presidential candidates support communism at a recent debate. Professor Austan Goolsbee explains why the comment is off-base:https://t.co/vmHFnkw9bg
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 3, 2020
The Fed made an emergency 50 basis point cut today. Professor Randall Kroszner discusses the surprising slash to interest rates on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street: https://t.co/yIB5KOR4GS @CNBC
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 3, 2020
As more wealthy Americans move downtown, research suggests the effects go beyond gentrification and widen the economic gap. https://t.co/bm7fHZymlf @chicagoboothrev
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 3, 2020
Bernie Sanders is a polarizing front-runner in the primaries. ProMarket explains likely and unlikely outcomes for the Democratic convention: https://t.co/mPPb4Anz2l
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 3, 2020
Research suggests health-care monopolies may pose a danger to patients: https://t.co/89vW9h7IBs
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) March 1, 2020
From Elizabeth Warren to Bernie Sanders, the democratic presidential candidates all want to increase taxes on the rich but to different degrees. ProMarket breaks down each tax plan: https://t.co/CWcVkk05SR @ProMarket_org
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) February 29, 2020
How would you address an idea your coworkers support but you think is disastrous? Chicago Booth Review shares strategies to help you handle it: https://t.co/xSr1JJz0m7 @chicagoboothrev
— Chicago Booth (@ChicagoBooth) February 29, 2020
Beautiful paper: Railroads increased aggregate TFP by expanding manufacturing activity in small counties that were previously held back due to inefficiently small local market
by Richard Hornbeck & Martin Rotemberghttps://t.co/uUJ9ujatpx https://t.co/rxuCCD6m16 pic.twitter.com/xUZsrb4rcJ— Farshad Ravasan (@Farshad_Ravasan) March 6, 2020
Prof. @liorjs on digital register gratuity prompts as dark pattern: https://t.co/HSxqz3aZRy
— UChicago Law School (@UChicagoLaw) March 7, 2020
Profs. @tomginsburg and @aziz_huq explain why state constitutions offer a promising arena for pro-democratic reforms https://t.co/KI0DaMlpPb
— UChicago Law School (@UChicagoLaw) March 5, 2020
Prof. David A. Strauss on Chief Justice Roberts' pivotal role in deciding how SCOTUS will or won't address abortion https://t.co/b4gPix73ee
— UChicago Law School (@UChicagoLaw) March 3, 2020
Video: In our most recent Chicago's Best Ideas talk, Profs. @anup_malani and @WeisbachD introduce a framework for thinking about income inequality https://t.co/gscpvQwhzX
— UChicago Law School (@UChicagoLaw) March 2, 2020
Prof. @DanielJHemel on the Baldwin v. United States and the Chevron doctrine https://t.co/A2gvPOZXEm
— UChicago Law School (@UChicagoLaw) February 26, 2020
How to Save a Constitutional Democracy, by @tomginsburg and @aziz_huq, recommended on this week's @ians_india bookshelf: https://t.co/fFxbpZ0yLL
— UChicago Law School (@UChicagoLaw) February 21, 2020
Cites Prof. @DanielJHemel on the viability of mark-to-market income tax https://t.co/57bqkEDzXX
— UChicago Law School (@UChicagoLaw) February 20, 2020
I'm tired of hearing myself talk about the futility of mandated disclosures, but it was great to revitalize my repertoire of complaints on an excellent episode of @npr @planetmoney https://t.co/N4uegloKVT
— Omri Ben-Shahar (@omribenshahar) March 5, 2020
My analysis of Justice Gorsuch’s opinion in Rodriguez v FDIC: https://t.co/OWCwmpaIQL. Lesson for lower courts: Judge-made rules are everywhere, but don’t call it “federal common law”
+some thoughts on SCOTUS’s dwindling federal tax docket— Daniel Hemel (@DanielJHemel) February 26, 2020
Alison LaCroix (@UChicagoLaw) was quoted in the cover story of this week's @nytimes magazine, about originalism and constitutional law, discussing research she oversaw through our Historical Semantics and Legal Interpretation project. Read the article: https://t.co/HRovsOHZvs pic.twitter.com/q1OZ1j1M26
— Neubauer Collegium (@UChiCollegium) March 3, 2020
Modern political debates about our economic system often pit a free-market capitalist system against government-controlled socialism, but Professor Anat Admati argues that we need to shift away from this binary view. https://t.co/Ly7LIkhcPJ
— Stanford Business (@StanfordGSB) March 5, 2020
In this episode, Lauren Weinstein (strategic communicator and author of @TEDx talk "Don't Believe Everything You Think") sits down with Matt Abrahams to share best practices to employ when explaining complex ideas so your audience can easily understand.https://t.co/1tQ2GC2E88 pic.twitter.com/np95roFKuN
— Stanford Business (@StanfordGSB) March 5, 2020
Do protests actually accomplish anything in terms of #ElectionDay results? Absolutely – a new study based on 30 years of data shows that both liberal and conservative protests have had a real impact on U.S. House elections.https://t.co/YLblS5RaNY
— Stanford Business (@StanfordGSB) March 3, 2020
Research found that voters are more likely to go to the booths when they are threatened with personal accountability and when they see voting as an intrinsic part of their identity, rather than just "something they do." #SuperTuesday https://t.co/DHpX7Hgyt0 #ElectionDay
— Stanford Business (@StanfordGSB) March 3, 2020
How do brands like @Nike and @Apple maintain their lasting appeal? It starts with having a “noticing power” that differentiates a brand from its competitors, and then innovating on what is already working. https://t.co/lQN94nB3rK
— Stanford Business (@StanfordGSB) February 29, 2020
Outfitting customers with cameras shed light on their purchasing behavior — and how retailers could use it to their advantage. https://t.co/plYZmRWY2J pic.twitter.com/aPnDooCXf6
— Stanford Business (@StanfordGSB) February 29, 2020
Not surprisingly, this study shows that people are more reckless with money that's not theirs.
"It seems some people are fine with going into debt as long as it doesn’t feel like debt." –Assistant professor Stephanie Tully
https://t.co/QVyetJp9qQ pic.twitter.com/YqoUfC3Kcy— Stanford Business (@StanfordGSB) February 26, 2020
After decades of government efforts and tens of billions of dollars spent, homelessness persists. Given the lack of progress it may be time to consider more innovative solutions: https://t.co/UZJqs2wTQz
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 8, 2020
Proponents of the Green New Deal want to shift all electricity production to renewable energy sources in just twelve years. Converting entirely to renewables in that time frame wouldn’t just be expensive, it would be impossible. Learn more: https://t.co/EblBAVaX5D
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 7, 2020
"The defense of the free market is central to the securing of individual freedom and equality under the law," writes @BerkowitzPeter: https://t.co/0plF376y1k
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 7, 2020
Recent Golden State Poll measured the attitudes of Californians: https://t.co/ezuwSMpl0n
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 6, 2020
.@EconomicsOne on the markets and monetary policy amid coronavirus developments: https://t.co/pj4rGN2cOu
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 6, 2020
When monetary policy has followed predictable, rules-based policies, we have seen long expansions, low inflation, and mild or infrequent recessions. @EconomicsOne on what sound monetary policy is, and why it is essential for economic growth and stability: https://t.co/mYIScT8nje
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 5, 2020
New release | "Choose Economic Freedom" by George Shultz and @EconomicsOne examines essential lessons learned from economic policies that were tried and that failed in the 1970s and reversed with success in the 1980s: https://t.co/lgXMdFzIFP
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 3, 2020
"California doesn’t build enough housing because of policies. These policies can and should be changed," writes @lee_ohanian. https://t.co/yJB6N7EUsq
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) March 3, 2020
In new book, "Choose Economic Freedom," George P. Shultz and @EconomicsOne point to clear historical evidence – and words of wisdom from Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman – to show why good economics leads to good policy and good outcomes: https://t.co/LVmiAbKrTU
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) February 29, 2020
It’s time to counter China and help American journalism survive, writes @KounalakisM: https://t.co/C6kbiuTEPa
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) February 28, 2020
"The greatest threat confronting democracies around the world is not from without but from within," writes @LarryDiamond: https://t.co/IqBnF6xAIZ
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) February 22, 2020
President Trump has reason for concern, writes Michael Boskin: https://t.co/EccVSjjpwr
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) February 21, 2020
The Soviet Union’s withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989 offers some important lessons for U.S. policymakers, writes Joe Felter: https://t.co/sqrw048iM9
— Hoover Institution (@HooverInst) February 19, 2020
. @VP Pence with @p_m_robinson
for a @HooverInst Board of Overseers policy discussion … LIVE now on https://t.co/R6byDko7jO https://t.co/94zOyMgiLP pic.twitter.com/92G9ijgcRP— Howard Mortman (@HowardMortman) February 24, 2020
New to my @ForbesOpinion space: a really Super Tuesday would be giving what’s left of a changing Democratic field a full week to work the 14 states. Too many delegates, too little tome. #SuperTuesday https://t.co/XupWdCWP8n
— Bill Whalen (@hooverwhalen) March 2, 2020
My @washingtonpost column: will #BernieSanders create delegate "shock and awe" in California? 415 pledged delegates at stake in Golden State on Super Tuesday – the four February states a combined 155 delegates.https://t.co/fiGvtMmVvT
— Bill Whalen (@hooverwhalen) February 29, 2020
Amazon Ring, a video security device, has left people feeling less secure, after a series of hacks allowed strangers to commandeer #Ring cameras to surveil and harass people in their own homes. @StanfordCIS's @kingjen weighs in via @Recode: https://t.co/Bq4D24nbi8
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) March 2, 2020
"We are deeply divided, not in terms of ideology or policy preferences, but in terms of how we conceive of and identify our political communities," writes SLS's @our_ford in a new @aminterest article: https://t.co/sh8hVOwuRO
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) March 2, 2020
“The use of this subpoena authority seems to be another example of the Trump administration distorting or manipulating the immigration laws to serve political ends,” says SLS's Lucas Guttentag via @Reuters: https://t.co/V47XVqQG7V
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) March 2, 2020
San Diego Superior Court Judge Timothy Taylor ruled that it is “more likely than not” that a trial would find that #Instacart workers who buy and deliver groceries would be classified as employees under #AB5. SLS's William Gould weighs in via @sfchronicle: https://t.co/WDAh773XoB
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 28, 2020
A database created by SLS and @acusgov numbers programs and agencies involved in administrative adjudication in the hundreds via @TheAtlantic: https://t.co/dtCaOxR0aN
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 28, 2020
A new report by SLS's @DanHo1 and David Freeman Engstrom examines the latest status of AI adoption by federal agencies via @Forbes: https://t.co/Nw7NdtfIar
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 26, 2020
Canadian onion prices are so low, some in the industry think Canada's government is subsidizing its growers, which could violate international law. SLS's Al Sykes weighs in via @AlBawabaEnglish: https://t.co/ntqgChpeww
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 26, 2020
In the wake of Trump's visit to India, Stanford Law's @dmistree discusses the impact of a $3 billion defense deal between US and India: https://t.co/pKWu8Uu2Br
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 26, 2020
"The easiest lever to hurt tech companies that a lot of people see is 230," says @StanfordCIS's @daphnehk via @reason: https://t.co/uRTKozCZek
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 25, 2020
"Delegation of nonexclusive duties functions currently as a complete workaround to the Vacancies Act’s time limits as almost nothing is exclusive to these positions by statute,” says SLS's @AJosephOConnell via @WIRED: https://t.co/ERldU9pYCt
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 25, 2020
"Is cloning passé, its moment in the spotlight having come and gone? If so, why?" asks SLS's @HankGreelyLSJU in his new op-ed via @statnews: https://t.co/7uODhVCjC1
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 25, 2020
According to SLS's @marklemley, intellectual property law has "traditionally not mapped neatly to political divisions." via @protocol: https://t.co/qCJgfajZoo
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 24, 2020
New research finds that courtroom psychology tests may be unreliable. SLS's @rmaccoun weighs in via @nytimes: https://t.co/o2OjeCdLzX
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 24, 2020
According to a Stanford report, while 40% of U.S. federal agencies have experimented with AI, only 15% of agencies use AI that's "highly sophisticated:" https://t.co/SP7QgqvFzZ
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 22, 2020
“Courts are not mere referees of the redistricting process; they have become active players often placed in the uncomfortable role of determining winners and losers in redistricting, and, therefore, elections,” says SLS's @persily via @FT: https://t.co/OszbKu4Y2q
— StanfordLaw (@StanfordLaw) February 19, 2020
Prof. Catherine Sharkey coauthored an op-ed in @thehill outlining key points from her research with @acusgov and @StanfordLaw exploring federal agencies’ use of artificial intelligence (AI) to carry out administrative law functions: https://t.co/NDmyhTB24F
— NYU Law (@nyulaw) March 1, 2020
In our course for @StanfordLaw & @StanfordGSB students, @katenrg and I explore growth in a changing climate. Brilliant @RebeccaReCap wrote the book on how leaders achieve sustainable performance & prosperity – out this April. It will be required reading. https://t.co/SSWR2m05LT
— Alicia Seiger (@aaseiger) February 26, 2020
COURSE ALERT: COS team members @jimleape, Annie Brett & @Kevinfiji are partnering with @StanfordLaw Janet Martinez for a spring @SLSPolicyLab practicum on #illegalfishing.
Learn more: https://t.co/ju2TOxpFux pic.twitter.com/fSTYOIEwe3
— Stanford Center for Ocean Solutions (@oceansolutions) February 25, 2020
Tune in around 20 minutes and 40 seconds to hear our and @StanfordLaw's @dmistree talking about President's Trump visit to India and the U.S. – India relations https://t.co/n8e6r69evG
— Stanford CDDRL (@StanfordCDDRL) March 2, 2020
“Is China being fair? By our standards in America and the West, the answer is clearly no. China has not been fair. By Chinese standards, China will say they’re being fair,” says @MaxBaucus in #StanfordLawyerMag https://t.co/9uRXBr77Rk
— Stanford Lawyer (@StanfordLawMag) February 21, 2020
The Democratic presidential field is divided & public opinion is fragmented and in flux. For CA primary #election voters, it’s an opportunity to step up on #SuperTuesday to cast a #vote that could propel one candidate into the frontrunner’s position. ☑️ https://t.co/CyTbpm6qSF
— UC Berkeley (@UCBerkeley) February 21, 2020
"100 million Americans who were eligible to vote in 2016 DID NOT vote. That’s a bigger number than the number who voted either for Donald Trump or for Hillary Clinton." @RBReich @GoldmanSchool #GOTV #BerkeleyBlog https://t.co/nUEijd6s7Q
— UC Berkeley (@UCBerkeley) January 31, 2020
.@BorensteinS: "California’s mystery gasoline surcharge strikes back." https://t.co/Y01gsaSfdo #mysterytax
— Haas School of Bus. (@BerkeleyHaas) February 11, 2020
On the "2020 @thinkers50 Radar" list of 30 thought leaders to watch is alum Michael Y. Lee, FTMBA 09, an @INSEAD prof who studies how organizations can thrive without conventional hierarchies. Congrats @yanche!https://t.co/A4uyV0n57V
— Haas School of Bus. (@BerkeleyHaas) February 4, 2020
.@richlyons on the elegance of Clayton Christensen's concept of #disruptiveinnovation. "We will always remember the beauty," he said. @TheEconomist https://t.co/FjECMfLKut
— Haas School of Bus. (@BerkeleyHaas) February 3, 2020
"Jack Welch’s departure as chief executive marked the high point of his — and arguably GE’s — reputation". Tony Jackson and I assess the imperious executive's life and career https://t.co/lpwvhkYlqH
— Andrew Hill (@andrewtghill) March 2, 2020
In 2011, @IBM had the opportunity to change the market with the development of its then one-of-a-kind AI technology, @IBMWatson. Yet somehow, the company's high expectations fell flat.
I examine why in my newest article for @Forbes:https://t.co/hQgPsxHhJi@BerkeleyHaas
— Henry Chesbrough (@HenryChesbrough) February 13, 2020
Finland will now give all new parents the same amount of leave — 164 days, paid — regardless of gender. Single parents will also have the right to use the parental leave quotas of both parents. https://t.co/zAD7QguLps
— The New York Times (@nytimes) February 7, 2020
Can the Bay Area Solve Its Affordable Housing Crisis? @KQED https://t.co/Orv4R6KpUP
— Fisher Center (@FisherUCB) February 13, 2020
The administration's #budget would reduce #SNAP funding by $182 billion over next 10 years.
But SNAP has been proven to have long-term health effects for beneficiaries, as @HilaryHoynes @UCBerkeley finds: https://t.co/nFl0RDurun
— EconoFactOrg (@EconoFactOrg) February 11, 2020
.@christianarana (MPP '17), policy director for @LatinoCommFdn quoted in @NYTimes article on the Latino vote. "People are channeling their anger into voting in a way we have not seen historically.” – https://t.co/Y724smnQsh
— Goldman School (@GoldmanSchool) March 3, 2020
"…even minor encounters with police can reduce the likelihood of voting" @NYTimes cites Professor Amy Lerman's research in piece about #StopandFrisk's lasting impact. https://t.co/OTUvGL4DFI
— Goldman School (@GoldmanSchool) March 2, 2020